Browsing Category

Poetry

Sick Bay

To close the week I’ll post Ginsberg’s poem Hospital Window, written in response to the last battle of the Vietnam War, mourning futile deaths in a futile war.

Here is the Wiki summary of the Mayaguez Crisis:

The Mayaguez incident took place between Kampuchea and the United States from May 12–15, 1975, less than a month after the Khmer Rouge took control of the capital Phnom Penh ousting the U.S. backed Khmer Republic. It was the last official battle of the Vietnam War. The names of the Americans killed, as well as those of three U.S. Marines who were left behind on the island of Koh Tangafter the battle and were subsequently executed by the Khmer Rouge, are the last names on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. The merchant ship’s crew, whose seizure at sea had prompted the U.S. attack, had been released in good health, unknown to the U.S. Marines or the U.S. command of the operation before they attacked. Nevertheless, the Marines boarded and recaptured the ship anchored offshore a Cambodian island, finding it empty

In response to the poem, I have been working over the last weeks on sketching still lives with bridges, looking from the inside out to a world where crossings lead us in all kinds of directions, challenged by longing and choices. The Brooklyn Bridge (above), part of the poem below, is among them.


Hospital Window

At gauzy dusk, thin haze like cigarette smoke 
ribbons past Chrysler Building’s silver fins 
tapering delicately needletopped, Empire State’s 
taller antenna filmed milky lit amid blocks 
black and white apartmenting veil’d sky over Manhattan, 
offices new built dark glassed in blueish heaven–The East 
50’s & 60’s covered with castles & watertowers, seven storied 
tar-topped house-banks over York Avenue, late may-green trees 
surrounding Rockefellers’ blue domed medical arbor– 
Geodesic science at the waters edge–Cars running up 
East River Drive, & parked at N.Y. Hospital’s oval door 
where perfect tulips flower the health of a thousand sick souls 
trembling inside hospital rooms. Triboro bridge steel-spiked 
penthouse orange roofs, sunset tinges the river and in a few 
Bronx windows, some magnesium vapor brilliances’re 
spotted five floors above E 59th St under grey painted bridge 
trestles. Way downstream along the river, as Monet saw Thames 
100 years ago, Con Edison smokestacks 14th street, 
& Brooklyn Bridge’s skeined dim in modern mists– 
Pipes sticking up to sky nine smokestacks huge visible– 
U.N. Building hangs under an orange crane, & red lights on 
vertical avenues below the trees turn green at the nod 

of a skull with a mild nerve ache. Dim dharma, I return 
to this spectacle after weeks of poisoned lassitude, my thighs 
belly chest & arms covered with poxied welts, 
head pains fading back of the neck, right eyebrow cheek 
mouth paralyzed–from taking the wrong medicine, sweated 
too much in the forehead helpless, covered my rage from 
gorge to prostate with grinding jaw and tightening anus 
not released the weeping scream of horror at robot Mayaguez 
World self ton billions metal grief unloaded 
Pnom Penh to Nakon Thanom, Santiago & Tehran. 
Fresh warm breeze in the window, day’s release 
from pain, cars float downside the bridge trestle 
and uncounted building-wall windows multiplied a mile 
deep into ash-delicate sky beguile 
my empty mind. A seagull passes alone wings 
spread silent over roofs.

May 20, 1975 Mayaguez Crisis 
Allen Ginsberg

Music today:Three Manhattan Bridges….https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cw5L_orYl8I

The Wound-Dresser

Men at War

One of my favorite contemporary baritones, Sanford Sylvan, suddenly died last month, a year younger than I.

“We are going to a very deep place within ourselves. And what comes up and what comes out is our Self.” This was part of his philosophy of singing (and teaching singing) and related to deep breathing but I think it encapsulates what is essential about any true artist. I had earmarked that sentence at some earlier time when trying to remind myself what, among other things, art is about. It tells you about yourself in addition to what you are trying to tell the world in hopes of reaction.

https://www.npr.org/sections/deceptivecadence/2019/01/31/690361685/sanford-sylvan-a-baritone-on-his-own-terms-dies-at-65

Angry Flames

The obituary gives you a fair summary of how singular Sylvan was as a singer. The link below let’s you hear for yourself – it is a remarkable performance of John Adam’s The Wound-Dresser. (And 3 cheers for the Oregon Symphony under Kalmar’s direction…) The album is called Music for a Time of War – but this is an anti-war piece if there ever was one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaG72mhcw3U

Torches

Here is the Walt Whitman poem the music is based on:

The Wound-Dresser

An old man bending I come among new faces,
Years looking backward resuming in answer to children,
Come tell us old man, as from young men and maidens that love me,
(Arous’d and angry, I’d thought to beat the alarum, and urge relentless war,
But soon my fingers fail’d me, my face droop’d and I resign’d myself,
To sit by the wounded and soothe them, or silently watch the dead;)
Years hence of these scenes, of these furious passions, these chances,
Of unsurpass’d heroes, (was one side so brave? the other was equally brave;)
Now be witness again, paint the mightiest armies of earth,
Of those armies so rapid so wondrous what saw you to tell us?
What stays with you latest and deepest? of curious panics,
Of hard-fought engagements or sieges tremendous what deepest remains?

2

O maidens and young men I love and that love me,
What you ask of my days those the strangest and sudden your talking recalls,
Soldier alert I arrive after a long march cover’d with sweat and dust,
In the nick of time I come, plunge in the fight, loudly shout in the rush of successful charge,
Enter the captur’d works—yet lo, like a swift running river they fade,
Pass and are gone they fade—I dwell not on soldiers’ perils or soldiers’ joys,
(Both I remember well—many of the hardships, few the joys, yet I was content.)

But in silence, in dreams’ projections,
While the world of gain and appearance and mirth goes on,
So soon what is over forgotten, and waves wash the imprints off the sand,
With hinged knees returning I enter the doors, (while for you up there,
Whoever you are, follow without noise and be of strong heart.)

Bearing the bandages, water and sponge,
Straight and swift to my wounded I go,
Where they lie on the ground after the battle brought in,
Where their priceless blood reddens the grass, the ground,
Or to the rows of the hospital tent, or under the roof’d hospital,
To the long rows of cots up and down each side I return,
To each and all one after another I draw near, not one do I miss,
An attendant follows holding a tray, he carries a refuse pail,
Soon to be fill’d with clotted rags and blood, emptied, and fill’d again.

I onward go, I stop,
With hinged knees and steady hand to dress wounds,
I am firm with each, the pangs are sharp yet unavoidable,
One turns to me his appealing eyes—poor boy! I never knew you,
Yet I think I could not refuse this moment to die for you, if that would save you.

3

On, on I go, (open doors of time! open hospital doors!)
The crush’d head I dress, (poor crazed hand tear not the bandage away,)
The neck of the cavalry-man with the bullet through and through I examine,
Hard the breathing rattles, quite glazed already the eye, yet life struggles hard,
(Come sweet death! be persuaded O beautiful death!
In mercy come quickly.)

From the stump of the arm, the amputated hand,
I undo the clotted lint, remove the slough, wash off the matter and blood,
Back on his pillow the soldier bends with curv’d neck and side falling head,
His eyes are closed, his face is pale, he dares not look on the bloody stump,
And has not yet look’d on it.

I dress a wound in the side, deep, deep,
But a day or two more, for see the frame all wasted and sinking,
And the yellow-blue countenance see.

I dress the perforated shoulder, the foot with the bullet-wound,
Cleanse the one with a gnawing and putrid gangrene, so sickening, so offensive,
While the attendant stands behind aside me holding the tray and pail.

I am faithful, I do not give out,
The fractur’d thigh, the knee, the wound in the abdomen,
These and more I dress with impassive hand, (yet deep in my breast a fire, a burning flame.)

4

Thus in silence in dreams’ projections,
Returning, resuming, I thread my way through the hospitals,
The hurt and wounded I pacify with soothing hand,
I sit by the restless all the dark night, some are so young,
Some suffer so much, I recall the experience sweet and sad,
(Many a soldier’s loving arms about this neck have cross’d and rested,
Many a soldier’s kiss dwells on these bearded lips.)

Agnes Dei

Photomontages today from another source for anti-war sentiment – my commissioned work for Karl Jenkin’s Armed Man – A Mass for Peace.

Sanctus

Vision

“So brave you’re crazy.” That is the meaning of the last name of poet Joy Harjo, a member of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation. I chose her poem attached below (it is too long to paste, alas,) given that her vision of mapping unknown worlds is related to today’s topic.

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/49621/a-map-to-the-next-world

After talking about an art detective yesterday, I want to introduce an archeological sleuth today, a man who was indeed both brave and crazy. Heinrich Schliemann took old texts as a map for his archeological ventures. Old as in The Iliad. His vision was set on fire when, as a seven year-old in 1829, he saw a print of burning Troy in a history book, and later, in the green-grocer store where he clerked, heard someone reciting the Iliad in the original Greek. (It’s Germany. It’s possible…so many of us running around looking for potatoes while declaiming classical texts in the original.)

Anyhow, the guy was a bit of a self-promoter, so it is hard to tell what is truth and what is fiction. The following facts are supported, however: he survived a shipwreck near the Dutch coast and later sailed on to America. (Brave and crazy.) He made fortunes in the US Gold Rush and as a war profiteer during the Crimean War in Russia. (Neither brave nor crazy.)

Barely 36, he used his fortune to educate himself both linguistically (it is said he was fluent in more than 10 languages, crazy) and archeology (brave.) He went around the world to gather knowledge, including India, China and Japan. Long story short: he discovered the sites of TroyMycenae, and Tiryns by taking the Iliad’s story as a guide that was not just a literary invention.

Along the way he conveniently omitted the names of all the experts who helped him, divorced his Russian wife to marry a young Greek schoolgirl, destroyed important evidence at the archeological digs through rough and unprofessional excavations and stretched the facts whenever it helped his reputation. Let’s settle on crazy.

He did, however, rekindle enormous interest in ancient history and popularized archeology. And German kids like me certainly read wide-eyed about his discoveries when young. Until the day when we realized that he in some fashion was responsible for the introduction of one of the most reprehensible symbols in the 20th century, the swastika.

He would go on to see the swastika everywhere, from Tibet to Paraguay to the Gold Coast of Africa. And as Schliemann’s exploits grew more famous, and archaeological discoveries became a way of creating a narrative of national identity, the swastika grew more prominent. It exploded in popularity as a symbol of good fortune, appearing on Coca-Cola products, Boy Scouts’ and Girls’ Club materials and even American military uniforms, reports the BBC. But as it rose to fame, the swastika became tied into a much more volatile movement: a wave of nationalism spreading across Germany.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/man-who-brought-swastika-germany-and-how-nazis-stole-it-180962812/#KFzGXickGsDgSmYU.99

Photographs today are of the state where he was born, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. They were taken in 2007, 18 years after the wall came down.

For music it shall be something from Mendelssohn’s Antigone. For those interested, there is a fascinating 2014 book on the Politics of Appropriation: German Romantic Music and the Ancient Greek Legacy by Jason Geary.



Perspective

A plume of smoke, visible at a distance
In which people burn.—George Oppen

Plumes

Love, can I call you that, you called me that the other night, Love, I couldn’t move today, or only sank, fell, falling. Today I slept until I couldn’t and looked for your call. Your message woke me. I replied. Twice, worried you hadn’t gotten the first. And you replied, and I thought, What folly. I cleared and fell asleep again. I looked for you online. Friends post pictures of Gaza in pieces, people in bits. The skyline in plumes. Plume, a pretty word, but who can afford it? I click through the OED, arranged in pixels on my screen. Regarding the souls of poets, Plato said, “Arrayed as they are in the plumes of rapid imagination, they speak truth.” Beholding the Angels Life and Death, Longfellow wrote of “somber houses hearsed with plumes of smoke.” In “The Exile,” Ibrahim Nasrallah, an exile, writes, “Poets surround me like the fruit of regret.” If we began as light, we became flesh and have become information. Light unto sensor into bytes. Digits, pixels. Our daily bread. The news feed: Omar al-Masharawi, eleven months, dead of burns, wrapped in white, borne upon his father’s arms, whose fingers splay across the shroud, steady and soft. More photos. In Gaza City, Jabaliya, more shrouds. Charred blocks in Khan Younis, Beit Lahiya. The dead, the dying. Rubble, stalks of rebar, ash and limbs. Columns of smoke gore the air, choking daylight. Missiles from a distance. And from a distance, plumes.

by Arash Saedinia
from Rattle #54, Winter 2016

The poem about Gaza was written by an Iranian-American artist and educator in 2016.

Here are some 2018 facts from Amnesty International:

As of October, 150 Palestinians had been killed, 10,000 had been injured, “including 1,849 children, 424 women, 115 paramedics and 115 journalists. Of those injured, 5,814 were hit by live ammunition.” The death toll rose by early December to 175 and by the end of the year to an alleged 220, and those shot in the legs are by now at least 6,392.

One Israeli soldier has been killed and one injured.

Any argument in favor of self-defense has to be abandoned here:https://www.juancole.com/2019/01/against-humanity-protesters.html

The Human Rights and Gender Justice Law Clinic (HRGJ) at the City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law just submitted a human rights abuse report to the UN about 45 children being killed during the Right of Return Marches since last March. The report notes that of the 56 Palestinian children killed by Israeli forces and settlers in the OPT during 2018, a total of 45 children were killed in the Gaza Strip since March 30, according to evidence collected by DCIP. In the overwhelming majority of cases, DCIP was able to confirm children did not present any imminent, mortal threat or threat of serious injury when killed by Israeli forces.

Photographs today are industrial plumes, not the plumes of war and occupation. Music here:

Point of View

Last week I visited a traveling exhibit at the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry which displayed, quite beautifully, a replica of the burial chamber of an Egyptian pharaoh, King Tut. When the glare of all that gold subsided, and the wonder, that so many things had survived millennia intact, found by relentless searching of a passionate amateur archeologist, what was left?

Thoughts on looting and attention. The riches of the pharaohs, the sagas of finding their tombs, the mythology around the curses befalling the grave diggers all have been in the spotlight of public attention for more than a century. Academia was fascinated with deciphering the hieroglyphs. Scientists to this day use every tool in the box to determine modes of living and cause of death (as well as consequences of severe incestuous marriage practices) on various mummies. Exhibits of the real thing, as well as of the replicas of the artifacts and relics found, attract literally more visitors than any other exhibitions on earth.

What is the fascination? I remember as a child being dragged to see queen Nefertiti’s bust in Berlin, flying into the city which was walled off by the Iron Curtain in the 60s, my first flight ever. Stumped by my mother’s awe, unmoved by anything I saw and uncomfortable about the fact that I seemingly didn’t get it. Is it the thought that at least some remain unforgotten after death? Admiration of successful sleuthing? Awe at the riches devoted to select individuals?

Pleasure at the object evidence that some ancestral “deities” also had musical instruments, played board games and scratched their backs just as we do? These are not rhetorical questions, I truly wonder.

Here is a reflection from 1818 by romantic poet Percy Bisshe Shelley, about another pharaoh and the vagaries of civilizations.

Ozymandias

I met a traveller from an antique land,
Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. . . . Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;
And on the pedestal, these words appear:
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.”

Certainly the Egyptian people have been looted. I am not talking about artifacts being dragged to European museums, either. I am thinking about what it would have taken to accumulate the riches displayed in the tombs, the building of the pyramids, the exploitations of the fellahs, or the victims of internecine conflicts among the families of the anointed in c. 1332–1323 BC when Tutankhaten lived his short life.

More recently, think what the Ottoman Empire, the French, starting with Napoleon and then the British did to the country. The latter occupied Egypt by 1882, stopping short of full annexation because of rival French interests, with endless empty promises that troops would be removed soon. Ostensibly to secure access to the Suez canal, the colonial move was much about marauding the country’s ability to grow lucrative crops.

By 1922, when Tut’s tomb was discovered, the British had eroded the country’s ability to feed itself by installing a mono crop approach on over 80% of all agricultural land: king cotton. Other than growing it and providing the unhealthy work of cleaning the fibers, the cotton processing industry was solely placed in England, depriving the Egyptian people of much needed work and industrial investment, making them dependent on expensive food imports, and prohibited any tariff or tax income from the cotton exports. And don’t get me even started on the Suez Canal…..that requires another full blog.

The people started to revolt in 1919 and by 1922 the British declared a limited independence – it took another 30 years to achieve full independence of the occupying forces – until they bombed the country in 1956 over the ownership of the canal. A great summary of the history can be found here: https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/egyptian-independence-1919-22/

Despite life under colonial occupation, the intellectual life flourished – here is one of my favorite examples: surrealism found its local expression around George Henein and his followers .

https://www.tate.org.uk/whats-on/tate-liverpool/exhibition/surrealism-egypt-art-et-liberte-1938-1948/exhibition-guide

Cause for Caroling

I feel like that bedraggled, aging thrush of Hardy’s poem, who believes in hope in a world that is a rather dark place, then and now. Or who simply does what nature requires, doing what’s needed for survival, equipped for that with instincts that aim at continuity and consequently inspiring hope.

Hope it shall be, then, during a celebration of same that is called Christmas.

The Darkling Thrush

BY THOMAS HARDY

I leant upon a coppice gate
      When Frost was spectre-grey,
And Winter’s dregs made desolate
      The weakening eye of day.
The tangled bine-stems scored the sky
      Like strings of broken lyres,
And all mankind that haunted nigh
      Had sought their household fires.

The land’s sharp features seemed to be
      The Century’s corpse outleant,
His crypt the cloudy canopy,
      The wind his death-lament.
The ancient pulse of germ and birth
      Was shrunken hard and dry,
And every spirit upon earth
      Seemed fervourless as I.

At once a voice arose among
      The bleak twigs overhead
In a full-hearted evensong
      Of joy illimited;
An aged thrush, frail, gaunt, and small,
      In blast-beruffled plume,
Had chosen thus to fling his soul
      Upon the growing gloom.

So little cause for carolings
      Of such ecstatic sound
Was written on terrestrial things
      Afar or nigh around,
That I could think there trembled through
      His happy good-night air
Some blessed Hope, whereof he knew
      And I was unaware.

Photographs of owls, sparrow and finches.

Now where do I find my blast-beruffled plume?

Infamous poet, ineffectual spy.

So far this week, aside from a guy on balls, we’ve met a woman pretending to be a man, a woman acting like a man (instantiated lust and violence included) and today we’ll travel with an Englishwoman from the early 1600s who was scorned for making money as an independent writer. More tellingly, she was attacked for her open discourse on sex and relationships, depicting in no uncertain terms the double standards held for women and men and writing about (homo)sexuality like a man.

Aphra Behn’s writing, in novels, plays and poems, was considered scandalous; even posthumously, centuries later, people like Alexander Pope and contemporaries had this to say: Behn “might have been an honor to womanhood—she was its disgrace. She might have gained glory by her labors—she chose to reap infamy.”

Robert Markley, a current scholar of 17th century theatre, phrases it this way: “In their ironic treatment of female chastity and masculine constancy…her comedies present a sophisticated and sympathetic understanding of the ideological complexities of women’s existence in a misogynistic society.”

She had quite a bit of adventure under her belt before she rose to “infamy:” travel to Surinam, where she met and befriended some of the natives, leading to a searing condemnation of slavery in her most famous novel Oroonoko. An assignment as spy under the code name Astrea, hired by Charles II during the Interregnum to find and turn some guy in Holland, a job that she failed miserably. She was thrown into debtor’s prison because her meager allowance ran out and she had been borrowing money for the trip back to England, money that the British government refused to refund. Eventually she started writing enormously successful plays with psychological insights way ahead of her times.

Heralded by her peers as a successor to Sappho, her poetry was explicit about sexuality. Her most famous poem is called The Disappointment.  Here is a quote about if from the Poetry Foundation: (click on title to read the poem.)

The Disappointment” has been traditionally interpreted to be about impotence. But it is also about rape, another kind of potency test, and presents a woman’s point of view cloaked in the customary language of male physical license and sexual access to females. The woman’s perspective in this poem provides the double vision that plays the conventional against the experiential.”

More detailed discussion of her works are here:

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43639/the-disappointment

And her life in general, here:

The First English Woman to Make a Living as a Writer Was Also a Spy

I was struck when I compared these three adventure-seeking women as to how much they had in common, across centuries: they were not willing to conform to the gender rules of their times, and tied sexuality in direct and explicit ways to their assessment of gender relations or their enactment of gender relations – throwing all caution to the wind. They were willing to be bad girls, in contrast to the good little women who surrounded them. Got to see the world, too, this way.

Yesterday’s NYT editorial spoke to this distinction of Madonna/Whore in clear and concise ways, and clarified the role of misogyny as “the law enforcement arm of patriarchal order, which has the overall function of policing and enforcing its governing norms and expectations.” Including the function of punishing the bad girls and rewarding the good ones….  click on photo for full article.   Hey, I stayed away from contemporary politics for at least 6 paragraphs!

Photographs from Holland, where Behn did not excel at spying.

Poems to Read

Poems to Read is an Anthology edited by Robert Pinsky and Maggie Dietz, the folks who gave us the Favorite Poem Project.  It is one of my go-to readers of poetry for three reasons:

  • I like everything Pinsky touches.
  • The poems are often introduced with short comments by those who suggested them, providing welcome guidance to understanding and interpretation.
  • The 7 chapters are loosely sorted by topic, some 30 or so poems each, allowing us to pick something relevant for the mood you’re in or the thing you’re thinking about.

This gives you the idea:

Chapter 1: There was a child went forth

Chapter 2: Either whom to love or how

Chapter 3: The forgetful kingdom of death

Chapter 4: In durance soundly caged

Chapter 5: Curled around these images

Chapter 6: Alive with many separate meanings

Chapter 7: I made my song a coat

I’ll be surprised if one of these did not draw your immediate curiosity.

And if you have avoided poetry for one reason or another, here is a primer of why you should give it (another) a try:

https://press.princeton.edu/titles/7329.html  

It is a small volume in which the former Poet Laureate argues that poetry is an inescapably democratic art form.

I grabbed a reading of Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird by Wallace Stevens for your pleasure.  I created montages for each stanza of this favorite poem, with a marble standing in for the bird, exhibited at Blackfish Gallery some years back. Images displayed here in the order of the stanzas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

What it takes: a different perspective

I was sent a famous poem yesterday that was entirely new to me. Nor was I particularly familiar with the poet other than plain name recognition. I’ll get to the poem in a minute. I was much more interested in my friend’s writing that accompanied his introduction to Delmore Schwartz: “Our bodies are such strange and astonishing and sometimes burdensome companions.”

To view one’s body as a companion rather than integral part of self creates a glorious distance. It relegates responsibility for unfriendly or destructive behavior by that very body when it refuses to function properly, to an entity that can be dealt with like all other external entities – with irritation, anger, dismay or fearfulness. Once you define “companion” as a separate other, you  no longer have to retreat to that horrid place where you feel a part of you is betraying all other parts of you and you are fighting yourself if you rage against that betrayal.

Of course, you then run into the next problem: if body is companion, is soul as well? What’s good for the goose is good for the gander and so forth? (Distracting aside: that proverb always struck me as a weird gender reversal – if the idea is that women should have the same privileges as men shouldn’t be the gander named first? Oh well.) If both of these basic constituents of what we perceive to be self are external components, then where is the very core?  Of course variants of that question have remained unanswered through millennia of philosophical searches, psychological research and now neuroscience’s attempts to join the chorus of seekers. We won’t solve that mystery today.

Here is the poem:

The Heavy Bear Who Goes With Me

“the withness of the body”

The heavy bear who goes with me,
A manifold honey to smear his face,
Clumsy and lumbering here and there,
The central ton of every place,
The hungry beating brutish one
In love with candy, anger, and sleep,
Crazy factotum, dishevelling all,
Climbs the building, kicks the football,
Boxes his brother in the hate-ridden city.
Breathing at my side, that heavy animal,
That heavy bear who sleeps with me,
Howls in his sleep for a world of sugar,
A sweetness intimate as the water’s clasp,
Howls in his sleep because the tight-rope
Trembles and shows the darkness beneath.
—The strutting show-off is terrified,
Dressed in his dress-suit, bulging his pants,
Trembles to think that his quivering meat
Must finally wince to nothing at all.
That inescapable animal walks with me,
Has followed me since the black womb held,
Moves where I move, distorting my gesture,
A caricature, a swollen shadow,
A stupid clown of the spirit’s motive,
Perplexes and affronts with his own darkness,
The secret life of belly and bone,
Opaque, too near, my private, yet unknown,
Stretches to embrace the very dear
With whom I would walk without him near,
Touches her grossly, although a word
Would bare my heart and make me clear,
Stumbles, flounders, and strives to be fed
Dragging me with him in his mouthing care,
Amid the hundred million of his kind,
The scrimmage of appetite everywhere.
And here is a fascinating review article that explains numerous different perspectives to be intuited from the verses above, beyond the issue of the “withness of the body.” In addition to giving a short overview of Schwartz’s life – too bitter, too needy, too self-destructive, too pre-occupied with seeking fame, too short – it explains how poems can stand in for the poet’s demands, the audience’s complicity, the writer’s self justification, his somewhat hidden plea for forgiveness and our power to provide it, or our gullibility of being lured into it by simply being hooked on the beauty of the language. It’s a worthwhile read.

That Inescapable Animal

Luckily there is great news for bodies: researchers have created a device that can be implanted under cancer patients’ skin to act as a “cell catcher.” It shows great promise in slowing down metastatic disease.

“The scaffold is designed to mimic the environment in other organs before cancer cells migrate there. The scaffold attracts the body’s immune cells, and the immune cells draw in the cancer cells. This then limits the immune cells from heading to the lung, liver or brain, where breast cancer commonly spreads.”

 https://news.engin.umich.edu/2016/09/implantable-decoy-could-limit-cancer/

Now let’s invent some decoy for the soul that catches self-defeating thoughts before they migrate!

Since I have no ready images of a bear of a body, I figured we’ll change perspective and focus on a bit of flitting-about soul. These dragonflies were all photographed yesterday in the heat of the middle of the day  – getting myself out to the river was definitely worth it.

Discrepancies

To close out this week of (mostly) musings on forms of conflict, I will offer a juxtaposition: how beautiful spring can look and how weird spring can sound.  The latter requires you to open the link below which will guide you to a recording of the sounds of rhubarb making noises while it grows. Not kidding, either.

https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/forced-rhubarb-makes-sound?utm_source=Atlas+Obscura+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=4b0f315c18-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_04_12&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_f36db9c480-4b0f315c18-66214597&ct=t(EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_4_12_2018)&mc_cid=4b0f315c18&mc_eid=1765533648

Instead of recommending a book on spring, or general issues of renewal, I am posting a tried & true poem of yore, Woodsworth’s Lines Written in Early Spring, which also juxtaposes opposites.

Enjoy a sunny weekend, smell the first lilac,  and forget for a while what man has made of man….