Browsing Category

Science

Contradictions: Science vs Magic

I’m torn today between choices of theme for the blog. Contradictions? Surprises? Puzzles? Since I dislike puzzles, feel ambivalent about surprises and embrace contradictions, you can guess the winner, even if you skipped reading the title….

Here is Monday’s story, then. Happened this summer.

Nadja Oertelt

Having hosted the loveliest of young women for a couple of nights, you get up too late to say Good Bye – she had to leave before the crack of dawn to return to New York City where she lives, or to meet investors for her science media company, Massive, in Los Angeles, or, for all I know, attend a science conference in Mumbai – I forgot, I’m speculating. Truth is, though, I missed her, she left and left behind a hostess gift.

A deck of Tarot cards. If you are like me, you will have to look up what Tarot actually is beyond the inkling that it is used for soothsaying. Here is Wikipedia to the rescue:

The tarot (/ˈtæroʊ/; first known as trionfi and later as tarocchi or tarock) is a pack of playing cards, used from the mid-15th century in various parts of Europe to play games such as Italian tarocchiniFrench tarot and Austrian Königrufen, of which many are still played today.[1] In the late 18th century, some tarot packs began to be used as a trend for divination via tarot card reading and cartomancy leading to custom packs developed for such occultpurposes.

Among English-speaking countries where these games are not played frequently, tarot cards are used primarily for novelty and divinatory purposes, usually using specially designed packs.[2] Some occult enthusiasts make relative claims to ancient Egypt, the Kabbalah, Indian Tantra, the I-Ching, among many others, though no documented evidence of such origins or of the usage of tarot for divination before the 18th century has been demonstrated to a scholarly standard .[2][3]The three most common decks used in esoteric tarot are the Tarot of Marseilles, the Rider-Waite-Smith tarot deck, and the Thoth tarot deck.

Add to them now this deck: Women of Science!

Aha, contradiction of a former scientist giving a gift of a tarot cards to a former scientist is resolved! And gives me the chance to introduce Nadja Oertelt, who holds a BS in Neuroscience from MIT, has done some amazing work in popularizing scientific research as a media producer and documentary filmmaker and is a visual artist. You can learn more about her and her company’s approach in this 2017 interview in Forbes or look at the trailer of her documentary Unorthodox of young orthodox Jews forging their own path.

Most interesting to me, though, is her insight that there need to be better ways to connect scientists and the public, and communicate scientific explorations or findings in a fashion that speaks to the lay folks, in particularly the young. In a society where science is, at best, not always trusted and, at worst, maligned as an elitist preoccupation that is wasting money, colliding with literal interpretation of scripture or annoyingly calling out the dangers of ruthless exploitation of natural resources or any other money-making enterprise – take your pick – endeavors that make science transparent and its importance understood are filling a significant need.

Inventor of computing science and daughter of poet Lord Byron…..

In Nadja’s own words, when someone raises an eyebrow at the contradictory combination of science and magic for a fundraising Tarot card deck,

“At Massive we know from our experience, and from the vast trove of research on effective science communication, that science stories centered on human experience and stories with emotional valence have greater impact on audiences. We want people who use this deck to learn about the history of science, and think creatively about how we can learn from the discoveries and failures, eureka moments and mistakes of the past to inform our future research and decision-making processes…as a species.  Our main goal as science communicators is to get people excited about science, to make science a more inclusive space, and to give people a sense of agency in scientific spaces. We want people to prioritize scientific thinking in their own lives and in their communities. We want people to do more research, to ask questions, and to remain curious. We don’t think creativity, storytelling, magical thinking and scientific thinking are totally disparate subjects. Neither did Jacob Bronowsky, Richard Feynman, Alan Turing, Marvin Minsky or Oliver Sacks.” 

Here is the description of the cards:

Created with Matteo Farinella and Massive Science, this crowdfunded 78 card Science Tarot Deck is a game of cards that helps us tell stories about our future based on principles of science. The Women of Science Tarot Deck channels the powerful, pioneering women of STEM alongside fundamental concepts in science, math, engineering and technology to help you tell stories about the future. The deck is a fun way to learn about our past and think about ways of tackling the big problems that await us as a species. The Tarot deck has been used since the 15th century as a framework for communal storytelling, soothsaying and prediction. We’ve updated our tarot to reflect our scientific, 21st century curiosity for shaping the world. The most transformative ways of thinking are not magic: they are real, rooted in STEM and they can help us collectively think about the future.

And here is my favorite, of course; what’s a bit of narrative adjustment to the definition of science between friends…

Since I don’t know how to read the cards, let me make a prediction for the future revealed to me in this morning’s coffee grinds: by bridging diverse fields and pursuing something that’ll improve all of society this young woman will make a significant contribution.

And here’s to intercontinental story telling in music – collision of protons, God particle, Geneva and all… The Higgs Boson Blues.

Back by popular demand: Nature!

Time to regroup and visit my regular landscapes where fall has made such a sudden entrance.

My first foray into nature this week was inspired by having my body and my mind fed by two beloved friends: a mushroom soup to die for, last month, and a book recommendation last week, added to the mile-high pile of books to read: Long Litt Woon’s The Way through the Woods – on Mushrooms and Mourning.

It is a widow’s description of working through her bereavement after the sudden and untimely death of her husband by becoming an authority on mushrooms; I cannot wait to read the book which received rave reviews – the anthropologist is said to be able to explore both the world of mushrooms (a somewhat random subject matter that helped focus attention) and the emotional travels through recovering from grief with passions and humor in equal parts.

Perfect timing, too, given that mushrooms are sprouting everywhere right now, with the dampness acting as catalyst to their emergence. All the photographs (some with iPhone, some with camera) were taken in the woods in an approximate one mile radius from my house within the last 8 days. Jealous yet?

And time for some amusement as well! It arrived when I went on a hunt for the appropriate music. The first thing that came up when typing in music for mushrooms was an article titled Science says this playlist is a must listen when tripping on mushrooms. Rest assured, that is not the activity I had in mind.

“Science” turns out to be one researcher who specializes in psilocybin experimentation and therapy. Psychologist Bill Richards, Ph.D., a researcher at Roland Griffiths’s lab at Johns Hopkins University and an expert in the field of hallucinogens claims to have the perfect playlist for those using (magic) mushrooms outside of mushroom soup or other culinary apparitions.

And I quote:

“…the order of songs is vital in crafting the right atmosphere, specifically during the “onset, peak, and post-peak phases”. The onset music should “supportive, unfolding, forward-moving”, like H.R. Reynolds’ arrangement of “O Magnum Mysterium”and Edward Elgar’s “Nimrod”. But once the peak sets in, things need to slow down a bit.

“At a trip’s peak, music becomes a mirror of transcendental forms of consciousness that may not even be registered in unitive awareness, but is present if needed—like a net below a trapeze artist,” Richards says. This cocktail includes multiple inclusions from classical luminaries like Brahms, Bach, Beethoven, and Mozart, along with a few dashes from other composers from a variety of cultures.

As the trip’s effects begin to wear off, the playlist can enter a more free-form state, tagging in tracks that are more familiar and sources of positivity and inspiration to the consumer. Interestingly enough, it’s also at this very end that lyrics really make their first appearance, and there’s good reason for their absence.”

Brahms as a net below a trapeze tripper? Beethoven, the security blanket? Bach, catcher of the fall? Okayyyyy….. And where are the Russian composers, their cuisine so dependent on all things fungal? No slavic mycelium dreams?

Well, let’s listen to Russian folk music instead which, if you’re tripping, might make you trip over your own feet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZcmI8FXW38

Let’s hope the scientific research on magic mushrooms is not an echo of the musical recommendations. It is certainly sprouting in the most unexpected places – just like mushrooms – lately in Jamaica, where a Canadian start-up is trying to study everything from the genetics of magic mushrooms to how best to extract their psychedelic compounds. These goals have both scientific and financial value. And there is sure competition around: Johns Hopkins just received a multi-million dollar donation to fund psychedelic research. Part of the research is devoted to figure out if psilocybin works as a treatment for a panoply of disorders and conditions: anorexia, opioid addiction, Alzheimer’s, chronic Lyme disease, post-traumatic stress disorder, and alcohol addiction.

I will, however, not be a participant in studies at the new Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research……I like my brain the way it is. A champion of champignons, at times morose like a morel, inclined to trifle with truffles, a brain as mucilaginous as a mushroom cap!

Busy Bees

Busy bees – or was that bumbly bees? This photographer was both, busy and bumbling, as well as forced to be extremely patient. I was sitting in front of the foxgloves in my garden, waiting for the bumble bees to emerge from the blossoms. By the time I had focussed the camera, they were, of course, long gone. Most of the time, anyways.

I had more luck in another beautiful garden where a huge variety of plants attracted a variety of bees, so many of them that I could practically shoot a picture wherever I had the camera pointed.

The phrase “busy as a bee” can be found as far back as in 13th century Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. They should add “smart as a bee” when you look at recent scientific experiments that reveal how these insects are able to perform complex cognitive tasks like, for example, discriminating between different art styles.

Have bees rewarded with sugar water when landing to feed on one of four different paintings by an Australian aborigine artist or put off by some bitter solution when landing on any one of four Monet reproductions and voila: if you now show them new paintings of each of these masters, they immediately pick the Australian art – and all it takes is one afternoon to have them figure it out. Now why did I have to take years of art education in high school?????

Not that it did much good. At least I didn’t end up like this: Dancing, covered in bees, with meditating comrades drifting off into La la land….

Here is something less funny but more interesting: a short clip on bumble bee life and social structure. And with this I wish you a busy Tuesday filled with sweetness in one form or another.

And no, it’s NOT ging to be Rimsky- Korsakov today, fooled you. Instead do enjoy this:

And a bonus minute of Schubert: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=21&v=1Pm6kBXkqT4

Horse Ta(i)les

Good. You didn’t think for a moment that I would write about Kentucky Derby decisions, disqualifications and all. Of course I won’t. Don’t know the rules of that sport, or any sport for that matter.

Instead I am praising science, once again, which has produced some fascinating new insights into the domestication of horses, a feat that revolutionized transport and warfare. You can read about the details here but here are the highlights:

Create an interdisciplinary team of 120(!) geneticists, evolutionary biologists and archeologists and let them figure out how 5500 years ago the horse became servant to (wo)man. Have them generate DNA data from 278 equine subfossils with ages mostly spanning the last six millennia.

Find out this way that in addition to the known two lines, domestic and Przewalski’s horses, there were two more, found on the Iberian Peninsula and in Siberia, now extinct.

Of special interest for these scientists was the fact that selective breeding shaping the look and functions of the horse started about 3000 years ago, most likely in Persia. Making them slimmer and stronger increased the mobility and speed of horses. Europeans picked up on this, and within a few hundred years they influenced the horse genome in more ways than through the previous 4000 years of domestication.

There is still uncertainty where the very first human horse interaction took place, despite all we know about horses. The traditional presumption that it happened in the steppes of Kasachstan was undermined by this current study. The most likely places under discussion are now Anatolia, the Pontic-Caspian steppes in Eurasia or the Middle East. Take your pick.

DNA analysis was also able to establish the recent impact of humans by means of diversity management, selection and hybridization of horses. What they found was not all good:

Most strikingly, we found that while past horse breeders maintained diverse genetic resources for millennia after they first domesticated the horse, this diversity dropped by ∼16% within the last 200 years. This illustrates the massive impact of modern breeding and demonstrates that the history of domestic animals cannot be fully understood without harnessing ancient DNA data. Importantly, recent breeding strategies have also limited the efficacy of negative selection and led to the accumulation of deleterious variants within the genome of horses. This illustrates the genomic cost of modern breeding. Future work should focus on testing how much recent progress in veterinary medicine and the improving animal welfare have contributed to limit the fitness impact of deleterious variants.

And while we are on the topic of DNA analysis, here is something to ponder about what the results of genetic testing in humans can or do tell us: misconceptions abound.

And if instead of experimental science you want some clinical psychology on this Wednesday morning, read this about psychics and the (hurt) feelings of horses.

You tell me if it makes horse sense.

Tilden Horse/ Marc Chagall
Tilden/ Gerhard Richter

Tilden Horse/Franz Marc
Tilden Horse/Paul Klee
Tilden Horse/Joan Miro
Tilden Horse/Richard Estes

Photographs today are of horse sculptures made by Steve Tilden and some of my pastiches using more of his work in the style of different painters.

Music from two very different sources:



Fish(y) Stories

Last week CBS news published an alarming article predicting that by 2048 salt water fish might be extinct. Just the kind of news you glance at and decide an already bleak view of the future has become even more dire on a sunny Monday morning.

Independent of our own delight in seafood, millions of people in the developing world depend on fish as protein source and for their livelihoods. Never mind what’s at issue for the larger food chain depending on healthy oceans.

Here’s the problem: it is a story that has perennially surfaced in the news since 2006 when the study it relies on was first published. Never mind that the scientific authors fundamentally revised their findings in 2009 because the study was relying on seriously flawed data and statistics.

You might argue that the criticism comes from the seafood industry and their own data are equally sketchy, driven by the desire to maintain the economic gains from fishing. But it is not an isolated case.

Three years ago there was much discussion of reports by the MacArthur Foundation and the World Economic Forum that by 2050 there will be more plastic than fish in the sea if we continue dumping plastic in the oceans at the present rate, measured by weight. Note that this claim rests on our ability to accurately measure the plastic and count the fish. Are we able to do that?

Their report certainly didn’t. It relied on plastic estimates derived solely from San Francisco Bay and assumed that was representative for the rest of the globe. The report never stated figures for the expected tonnage of fish in 2050, and cited no research into fish populations. When reporters went back and asked about this issue they were referred to a 2008 study which was refuted by its own author in 2015. (For details go here.)


The problem with these types of misinformation rests with the fact that it gives power to those who want to deny that our oceans are in trouble. Or, more egregiously, want to claim that science can’t be trusted in general. Generally solid reports like this one are then thrown out together with the unreliable ones, in the interest of delaying action and preserving current income.

The WWF report lists the main reasons for decline of fish stocks in our oceans. Overfishing and by-catch are due to illegal fishing and insane subsidies for the fishing industries. As a result we have degraded eco systems and decreased food security. Action is required to create areas protected from fishing and to stop the industrial subsidies that are incentives for expanding fishing fleets.

I leave it to you to judge if clips like this, earnestness notwithstanding, help the cause…..

There is, however, also good news, as reported in the Seattle Times this March (somehow the link is broken, but here is the upshot:)

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is investigating whether new fishing restrictions are needed to help prevent the extinction of endangered southern resident killer whales that frequent Puget Sound. That process is intended to result in fishing that lessens the impact on prey targeted by the whales. Possibilities include restrictions in time and places when fishermen and whales most intersect, or season closures. And not only in the ocean: NOAA is also evaluating fishing in Puget Sound and southeast Alaska to reduce impacts on orcas. The agency already, through the Pacific Salmon Treaty, worked to cut back harvest rates on salmon in Canadian fisheries.

Photographs today are from Puget Sound where I had thrilling views of whales some years back.

Music is a mesmerizing piece by Adams Becoming Ocean that somehow manages to communicate the urgency of required action. Music starts in at 7:35 or thereabouts.

https://site-323590.bcvp0rtal.com/detail/videos/by-composer/video/6008570918001/john-luther-adams-become-ocean?autoStart=true


Supernatural Enforcement

I’ve been wondering, as is my wont. The topic: oh, something narrowly defined, like the interaction between religion, politics and societal evolution. As a result you all have a few choice reading assignments today, should you share my fascination.

Jokes aside, I HAVE been rattled by the outspokenness of the Christian Right in both peddling dominionism, a “group of Christian political ideologies that seek to institute a nation governed by Christians based on their personal understandings of biblical law,” and a longing for (and prediction of) the end times, in which they and only they will be saved. Betsy deVos certainly advocates for this mysticism and then there is John Bolton who willingly adds his biblical interpretations to the mix (Trump sent by G-d to save the Jews from the Iranian menace? As a Christian he believes it possible!)

And now, with the Mueller report completed and Barr’s decisions around it delivering a gift for Trump, my worries increase. Whether one believes it would matter that Trump (as an individual) should be felled or not, the proclaimed vindication is certainly empowering the underlying rot, comprised of people and ideas, and gives it momentum for its destructive mission. That will not be changed by whatever we’ll discover, should there ever be transparency, a full reading of the report, or dragged-out State court proceedings. They circled the wagons around their own and succeeded.

Roaring to capitalize on all this are people like Bolton, who, by the way, was a major architect of the Iraq war, a war that cost over half a million lives (beyond the 5000 American troops) if you count civilian deaths caused by violence and collapsing infrastructure. And that is only the dead. Nobody seems to count the permanently crippled, maimed, blinded, traumatized victims, or a population deprived of the kids never to be born. Source for statistics below, no need to peruse.

https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001533 .

What you really should (re-)read on the 16th anniversary of the Iraq invasion is what’s attached beneath, so brilliantly written by Eliot Weinberger.

https://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n03/eliot-weinberger/what-i-heard-about-iraq

———————————-

Back to topic: Religion affecting societies. Have you noticed how many recent editorials or articles are focussed on the link between religion and politics? Here are two typical examples.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-left-was-about-salvation-the-right-is-about-the-end-times/2019/03/18/2cd16898-49b8-11e9-9663-00ac73f49662_story.html?

https://ips-dc.org/apocalyptic-christianity-returns-u-s-foreign-policy/

Underlying all of those speculations on the end times is the concept of an angry, judging, punishment-meting G-d. Which brings me to the truly interesting, scientific reading for today, just out this week in the journal Nature: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1043-4

The argument, provided by a research group of Oxford scientists, in a nutshell: what do we know about the appearance of “moralizing” G-ds, who, as it turns out, have not always been around even when other ones were? Harvey Whitehouse and his colleagues systematically coded records from 414 societies that span the past 10,000 years from 30 regions around the world, and used 51 measures of social complexity and 4 measures of supernatural enforcement of morality. The resulting claim: the more complex a society, the more likely the presence of supernatural agents who make sure rules are followed and who are invested with the power to identify and punish individuals who don’t, even beyond death.

The critical mass seems to be around 1.000.000 – societies with that many members develop belief systems that emphasize “supernatural reinforcement.” Big Gods (or the related concept of retributive Karma) push people in the direction of prosocial behavior to prevent asocial tendencies that might be disruptive to the community as a whole when they can no longer be controlled through tribal/neighborly supervision. It takes about 100 years after you’ve reached the one million benchmark, for a vengeful G-d to appear.

(Note, I am not singling out Christianity here, dominionists were just the trigger for my musings.)

Moralizing gods are not a prerequisite for the evolution of social complexity, but they may help to sustain and expand complex multi-ethnic empires after they have become established.”

The argument is not without critics – some claim that the complexity of societies is associated with the (subsequently emerging) ability of people to think about questions of meaning and answer them with religious concepts.

The Whitehouse data seem to point to a different causality. Most interesting for us, though, has to be the question: when does the idea of a punitive God, thought to be a stabilizing factor for complex societies, flip into the opposite? When does that belief lead to violent acts, civil strife, oppression of people who don’t buy the concept, or pray to another moralizing G-d? Will it again be used to justify another war?

Photographs today are European spires seen across my last two trips.

Music is dedicated to all who died at the hands of believers in a reinforcing G-d. May the beauty of the music console us on this Monday.

Bird Hospital

Why do I like my Leberwurst so much….. was my first inane thought about one of the most fascinating articles I read last week. I don’t know what your reaction will be to the mix of science reporting, journalistic adventure story and non-didactic teaching about an Indian religious sect that goes to extreme length to protect animals, but mine was awe mixed with apprehension. And yet another thought about trying to curb my meat consumption.

We have discussed animal cognition here before, but the description of the Jains’ reverence and a discussion of new scientific data about animal consciousness goes way beyond anything I’ve previously integrated. This is not just about eating or not eating one’s prey. It is about a pretty radical new understanding of what took place during evolution.

The article starts with a description of a bird hospital in Old Delhi run by devotees of Jainism,” an ancient religion whose highest commandment forbids violence not only against humans, but also against animals.” It’s the setting to delve into the history of that religion followed by a comparison of it’s tenets to what modern science has to say about consciousness in species other than humans.

Ross Anderson, the author, is careful: Many orthodox Jain beliefs do not stand up to scientific scrutiny. The faith does not enjoy privileged access to truth, mystical or otherwise. But as perhaps the world’s first culture to extend mercy to animals, the Jains pioneered a profound expansion of the human moral imagination. The places where they worship and tend to animals seemed, to me, like good places to contemplate the current frontier of animal-consciousness research.

You can read the list of scientific developments in the article attached below. What particularly lingers with me was this one fact: fish – like mammals of course – are conscious in the sense that they experience pain. Unlike us, they do not have the capacity to know that pain will end, either by healing or by the bliss of (permanent) unconsciousness and so are stuck in seeming eternity. Imagine. No, don’t. It’s given me nightmares.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/03/what-the-crow-knows/580726/https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/03/what-the-crow-knows/580726/

Photographs today are of robins in my icy garden, photographed through the window last week.

Music from Respirghi’s The Birds https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZzpcnYy1jQ

Things to be grateful for: Science

· ·

Wheat

I am always thankful when there is a scientific explanations for things that I find troubling. And never more so than when the explanation packs a surprise while simultaneously making you slap your head along the lines of “Of course… why didn’t I see that one coming.”

Consider the following, for example. If we took a soil sample from every county in the American South and analyzed it for mineral deposits, which make the soil rich, we would get a map that shows a “black belt.” These stretches of land across the South have dark soil, more fertile than others, and are thus amenable for producing certain nutrient dependent crops, like cotton, tobacco, indigo and rice.

If you superimpose a map of every county election outcome across the South on the soil map, you find that they perfectly overlay – the darker the soil, the more conservative the vote. And that does not go only for the vote per se – if you research attitudes across all those counties, the ones with richer soil have culturally more conservative views and are more (openly and latently) racist, assuming a value differential between white and black people and agreeing with legal, institutional or social measures to prevent the progress of Blacks.

Sun Flowers

Deep Roots: How Slavery Still Shapes Southern Politics is a scientific exploration of this phenomenon. Avidit Acharya, a political scientist at Stanford, Matt Blackwell, a professor of government at Harvard and Maya Sen, a professor of public policy at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, link current conservative attitudes towards gun rights, death penalty and racial resentment in parts of the South directly to a slave holding history, in a book written during the Obama years, no less.

Here is the full argument: https://art19.com/shows/why-is-this-happening-with-chris-hayes/episodes/1c01f809-2331-4d1f-97be-7320c96af997

 

 

 

Corn

And here is my distillation in a nutshell: Cotton and tobacco industries thrived on chattel slavery, since those crops were extremely labor intense. After the Civil War, those regions’ economic survival depended on finding ways to continue to exploit Black labor. Anti-Black laws and practices, from Jim Crow to the undermining of education and participation in the political sphere, served that purpose. What the authors add, though, is a mechanism called behavioral path dependence: Generation after generation passed down and reinforced beliefs about racial inequality and the need to impede progress of those deemed inferior. Children learned from their parents and taught their own children, all the while being backed up by local institutions that echoed the value judgments and created spaces for segregation.

Rape seed

When slavery was abolished and with it Ante Bellum Laws, the subjugation of Blacks now relied increasingly on cultural mechanisms:

MAYA SEN: I think things like racialized rhetoric from the top down can have really, really damaging and long-term impacts. So things like talking about people in dehumanizing language, institutionalizing policies that treat people as less than human. Those things can really create attitudes that then persist for a long time.

.. to be able to kind of preserve the same structure, economic structure that we had  with slavery it required a lot more kind of local vigilance to kind of enact these policies. So you had a kind of creation of a culture, a maintenance of a culture that required things like extrajudicial violence, it required basically training and indoctrinating young children into thinking about the world in certain ways.

And this culture is incredibly resistant to change, proceeding at a glacial pace. In other words, federal interventions, like the Civil Rights Act or the Voting Rights Act (what’s left of it…,) can address behavioral discrimination, but they do nothing with regard to attitudes. Children who are indoctrinated from an early age will carry their parents’ attitudes to the next generation.

Grapes

Berries and fruit trees

Here is the full introductory chapter to their book:

https://books.google.com/books?id=zKtADwAAQBAJ&pg=PA1&lpg=PA1&dq=maya+sen+soil&source=bl&ots=d6EGFYepGL&sig=MSHEo1H07y9bSAicq6AWPPwEWT4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjAuvuI59zeAhXKilQKHe1FBrE4ChDoATAIegQICRAB#v=onepage&q=maya%20sen%20soil&f=false

It has nothing to do with what is happening in the present, or how you could rationally argue about economic interests in the present. It is about pervasive prejudiced beliefs instilled through generations, not likely to be eradicated by external education unless they are systemically tackled over the long haul.

Photographs are of crops grown in my immediate vicinity….

Cabbage

And last but not least: hazel nuts and tulips!

 

93 Degrees

Hot enough to flee the city and go to the beach. A long and leisurely drive along US Highway 30, the Old St. Helens Road,  gives you enough time to listen to a Radiolab podcast that reveals the most amazing story.

(I, by the way, usually do not listen to podcasts or books on tape. Part of that has to do with the fact that I associate taped narrative with all the times I was hospitalized as a child or teenager and could not even hold a book. So they would set me up with tape recordings, TVs were not present in pediatric wards. These days I also find that I am just impatient – I read fast, and admit to skipping, and listening slows me down to a degree that makes me twitchy.)

In any case, I make exceptions if I am told by a trustworthy source, now paddling his canoe, that I HAVE to listen to this or that recording. And so I stumbled onto this modern medical miracle, a feel-good-story if there ever was one.

https://www.wnycstudios.org/story/fronads

Here is the short version: Women who undergo chemotherapy or radiation usually lose their fertility, the ovaries get poisoned, fried or otherwise shut down. Freezing eggs beforehand is not an option – they contain so much liquid that gets crystallized by freezing that it bursts the ovum.

Several years back a doctor in NYC experimented with the removal of one of the ovaries of a young woman about to undergo serious chemo for Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Her survival chances were slim, but she clung to the promise that if she was cancer free 2 years after treatment, they would re-implant the ovary. Which she was and they did – putting it for easy access right under her belly button, assuming that they would harvest eggs for IVF from there, should it kick back into action. In other instances they implant the tissue into your arm. Go figure.

Imagine everyone’s surprise when she got pregnant the old-fashioned way.  Not once but three times across the next several years. And she is not the only one; by now there are over 100 children born with this type of implantation, all without IVF.

So what’s happening here? They still don’t know, but two major theories are offered, one stranger than the other. Either the implanted ovary starts ovulating and somehow the egg migrates into the bloodstream and finds its way to the niche where it belongs, locating the fallopian tubes and moving into the uterus. Or the hormonal set-up from the implanted ovarian tissue triggers something in the system, bringing the seemingly destroyed ovary that is still down in the original  place back to life and pumping. In either case, it is miraculous.

Once you are at the beach you can photograph crabs (the German name Krebs denotes both the crustacean and cancer), cool off, and think about the mysteries of science……

….or about the fact that if all these miracle children learn not to giggle, they can partake in Haydn’s Kindersynfonie  ….

 

100 Degrees

Heat is above us, within us, around us and seemingly here to stay for the next weeks. Since there are too many things to list about it that are not good, I thought we’ll look at one thing that is: droughts are a boon to archeology. At least that’s what they find in the United Kingdom, particularly Scotland and Wales.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/uk-heatwave-revealing-ancient-sites-wales-180969601/

Ditches that were dug 100 years ago, or 500, or 100os of years, around burial sites, or fortifications, for example, hold more moisture than the surrounding landscapes, even if they are covered up (and thus usually invisible.)

Plants who happen to grow on top or alongside these ditches have more access to moisture than everyone else in the vicinity and thus stay green longer or grow taller when everything else is withering on the stalk.

 

All you need is an airplane, an experienced eye and a sense for archeological shapes, and you are good to go. Surveys from above will reveal ancient configurations that are not standing out when nature is evenly green.

I am not sure if this translates to the U.S. – and frankly am too hot to check that out. But I did have some music by Mendelssohn in mind  that describes the Hebrides, the island chain in front of Scotland, and the rolling waves – providing a bit of cool relief.

Montages are views from an airplane window while approaching San Francisco.